K&N air intake installed w/ power gains (dyno results)

[all/things/new]

There's no cover on the top of it?

Nope

Sponsored

 

[Fattirz in NC]

Wonder if they’ll offer a kit for the 2.7l engine too? That base engine is nice and plenty powerful, but man the 2.7l is awesome! I can’t even imagine how awesome the 3.0l twin turbo is in the RR!!!

 

[tubingchamp]

Man I hope they release one for the 2.7

 

[all/things/new]

Wonder if they’ll offer a kit for the 2.7l engine too? That base engine is nice and plenty powerful, but man the 2.7l is awesome! I can’t even imagine how awesome the 3.0l twin turbo is in the RR!!!

It will be available for the 2.7 May 1

 

[Oval6G]

Thanks for posting! Curious if one will be available for the RR? Hopefully they will publish dyno results for that application as well.

 

[chiefdave]

I learned the hard way that those oiled gauze filters will gum up your throttle body.

 

[Dre' Dawg]

K&N used my 2024 Ranger Lariat FX-4 to prototype their intake system for the newest generation of Rangers. Finally got the production version, it makes the turbo more audible and the whoosh whoosh is nice. I was surprised that the get up and go was very noticeable. Picked up about 15 HP and 21 lbs torque

Oh. I have the 2.3 engine.

K&N used my 2024 Ranger Lariat FX-4 to prototype their intake system for the newest generation of Rangers. Finally got the production version, it makes the turbo more audible and the whoosh whoosh is nice. I was surprised that the get up and go was very noticeable. Picked up about 15 HP and 21 lbs torque

Oh. I have the 2.3 engine.

I put the K&N filter on my 2013 Shelby GT 500 and when I brought it to my dealership the head of service, who is a long time Ford performance guy, told me to take it out as it does not filter as good as a Motorcraft and could case engine damage. This is what a Google search turned up. "

• Maintenance:
  K&N filters require cleaning and re-oiling, which can be an extra step in maintaining them.
  
  
• • Limited Performance Gains:
    While K&N filters can improve airflow, the actual performance gains (horsepower or torque) are often minimal and may not be noticeable in everyday driving.
    
  • Dirt and Dust:
    Some users have concerns that K&N filters might allow more dirt and dust into the engine compared to standard filters.
    

In Conclusion:
K&N air filters can be a good option for those seeking a reusable, high-flow filter with potential long-term savings and improved engine responsiveness, but potential issues with MAF sensors and the need for regular maintenance should be considered. "

 

[RANGER/HOBB]

I put the K&N filter on my 2013 Shelby GT 500 and when I brought it to my dealership the head of service, who is a long time Ford performance guy, told me to take it out as it does not filter as good as a Motorcraft and could case engine damage. This is what a Google search turned up. "

• Maintenance:
  K&N filters require cleaning and re-oiling, which can be an extra step in maintaining them.
  
  
• • Limited Performance Gains:
    While K&N filters can improve airflow, the actual performance gains (horsepower or torque) are often minimal and may not be noticeable in everyday driving.
  • Dirt and Dust:
    Some users have concerns that K&N filters might allow more dirt and dust into the engine compared to standard filters.

In Conclusion:
K&N air filters can be a good option for those seeking a reusable, high-flow filter with potential long-term savings and improved engine responsiveness, but potential issues with MAF sensors and the need for regular maintenance should be considered. "

Knew it wouldn’t be long before the naysayers to show up.

Doesn’t affect a MAF or MAP sensor at all. Oiling of any K&N filter is insignificant if done correctly, nor does it blow off once dry.

The 3.0T RR uses a MAP sensor downstream and isn’t located in the intake. There is an IAT sensor in the intake tube. Normal maintenance is all that’s required for either sensor.

FORD Performance, exclusively utilize K&N filters in the GT500 with their tuning packages. It’s also the only factory authorized, aftermarket replacement filter.

Keep in mind, it’s customary when you copy and paste from a website to post the URL or the actual authors name for reference. Not all internet references are accurate or factual. There are literally over one hundred + references with regard to this subject.

Now besides anecdotal referenced commentary, what actual first hand experience do you have with this K&N Intake or any for that matter?

This particular thread happens to be about a 2.3T K&N Intake, not an oiled K&N filter for a 2013 GT500.

Dry

This K&N intake is running a dry filter as per the op with a specific Dyno chart.

 

[Dutch]

Dyno "Numbers" mean nothing - especially from someone who will profit from those numbers.

 

[Dre' Dawg]

Knew it wouldn’t be long before the naysayers to show up.

Doesn’t affect a MAF or MAP sensor at all. Oiling of any K&N filter is insignificant if done correctly, nor does it blow off once dry.

The 3.0T RR uses a MAP sensor downstream and isn’t located in the intake. There is an IAT sensor in the intake tube. Normal maintenance is all that’s required for either sensor.

FORD Performance, exclusively utilize K&N filters in the GT500 with their tuning packages. It’s also the only factory authorized, aftermarket replacement filter.

Keep in mind, it’s customary when you copy and paste from a website to post the URL or the actual authors name for reference. Not all internet references are accurate or factual. There are literally over one hundred + references with regard to this subject.

Now besides anecdotal referenced commentary, what actual first hand experience do you have with this K&N Intake or any for that matter?

This particular thread happens to be about a 2.3T K&N Intake, not an oiled K&N filter for a 2013 GT500.
This K&N intake is running a dry filter as per the op with a specific Dyno chart.

Jeff,

I'm not a naysayer. As in all decisions you should weigh the pros and cons and make an informed decision.

 

[RANGER/HOBB]

Jeff,

I'm not a naysayer. As in all decisions you should weigh the pros and cons and make an informed decision.

You’re input has no validity with this thread, as commented above.…..

An informed decision, is based on specific factual commentary, not anecdotal information or personal speculation.

Yes, you’re a naysayer; without any factual, conclusive evidence, regarding this K&N intake.

In fact, you’re actually off topic…….

 

[Awirez]

I'm not hating on it. To each their own. It looks good. It will sound good, perhaps at the expense of intaking hot engine bay air when the hood is shut, it appears, unless there is sealing around the large opening I couldn't see. I would think the dyno run was done with the hood open. I'm not sure how well the inlet above the front grill receives ram/ambient air while at highway speeds, however; so, that may offset it while in motion. I see the advantage/desire for racing applications, hearing the turbo compressor, or for looks.

I wish there were an aftermarket setup that was similar with a better filter element. I've used K&N in the past. From my experience, I wouldn't deem it worthwhile. If anyone wants to research air filtration, add ISO 5011 to your internet search query.

Just chiming in on the conversation, don't mind me. If you want it, get it.

 

[RANGER/HOBB]

Dyno "Numbers" mean nothing - especially from someone who will profit from those numbers.

Dynamometer readings are an indicator of added or reduced hp beyond an OEM setup. These numbers change based upon altitude, ambient conditions, dynamometer utilized and SAE correction factors.

However, there is no conspiracy theroy connected to dynamometer readings. They can’t be adjusted up or down to suit the operator/owner. Instead, they demonstrate real world application for crank and wheel horsepower.

This particular intake is well designed; uses a larger diameter air intake tube and venture, along with a larger, better designed air box. Thus it provides greater CFM flow and larger air intake capacity. Top is sealed by the hood and fire suppression, blanket. Only limiting factor is the air intake funnel.

This can be overcome by the addition of a Velossa Tech Ram Air Intake.

 

[Gerry Bourret]

K&N used my 2024 Ranger Lariat FX-4 to prototype their intake system for the newest generation of Rangers. Finally got the production version, it makes the turbo more audible and the whoosh whoosh is nice. I was surprised that the get up and go was very noticeable. Picked up about 15 HP and 21 lbs torque

Oh. I have the 2.3 engine.

Like to know what the numbers would be on a 2.3L with the performance calibration installed

 

[all/things/new]

Man I hope they release one for the 2.7

May first

Like to know what the numbers would be on a 2.3L with the performance calibration installed

hmmmmm. I wonder if I could get them to pay for it for me for test purposes?

Sponsored