Mad_Motorhead
Well-Known Member
Probably around 470 crank horsepower topsExactly. What would you say you would be at after the AFE intake as of horsepower
Sponsored
Probably around 470 crank horsepower topsExactly. What would you say you would be at after the AFE intake as of horsepower
Links to your claims the fuel system has been proven to fall short when a custom tune is done with an airbox. Iād like to see IDCs and fuel tables.Links to what? There is no link to anyone making 500hp out of a 3.0L ecoboost with just an airbox and an intercooler.
Thereās several that have done it with downpipes, fuel pump, injectors, etcā¦
Nobody has more experience tuning the 3.0 EB than these guysā¦Links to your claims the fuel system has been proven to fall short when a custom tune is done with an airbox. Iād like to see IDCs and fuel tables.
I linked you a 3.0 ecoboost Bronco Raptor done by 5Star tuning with an intake making almost 500 bhp in this thread, maybe you should watch it (even gave you a timestamp).
Sorry, just saw your post ! Missed the second pageNobody has more experience tuning the 3.0 EB than these guysā¦
Even with an upgraded fuel pump and injectors they arenāt making 500hp w/ E85.
![]()
Big difference between RWHP and BHP (crank). OP didn't specify and is looking for a general number. Details matter.Nobody has more experience tuning the 3.0 EB than these guysā¦
Even with an upgraded fuel pump and injectors they arenāt making 500hp w/ E85.
Boys, Boys,Boys !Big difference between RWHP and BHP (crank). OP didn't specify and is looking for a general number. Details matter.
I showed a video with crank rated HP numbers on a dyno with an intake... the ZFG tune data you are comparing is showing RWHP so we aren't comparing apples to apples. Not once did I say RWHP. The Ford Performance tune numbers always get tossed around with crank HP too. Clearly RWHP is a better metric, but for any comparison you have to use the same metrics.
Aaaaand that absolute beast of an engine fits under the hood of the RR, doesnāt it !? (Hex wrote while Praying hard and throwing signs of the cross in the airā¦)Boys, Boys,Boys !
![]()
It's a roomy engine bay. If I do keep this truck a long time it will likely go under transplant surgery for a Coyote 5.0 with SC or maybe even a 5.2 Raptor R crate motor.Aaaaand that absolute beast of an engine fits under the hood of the RR, doesnāt it !? (Hex wrote while Praying hard and throwing signs of the cross in the airā¦)
There was a place that swaps the Coyote into the 6G Bronco at SEMA, but it's hardly plug-n-play and more than likely how the RRaptor would end up if attempted. (ignore the Bronco specific stuff in that pic)It's a roomy engine bay. If I do keep this truck a long time it will likely go under transplant surgery for a Coyote 5.0 with SC or maybe even a 5.2 Raptor R crate motor.
![]()
If Ford gets a wild hair to add a Ranger Raptor "R" with 5.0 and I'm upgrading for sure.
Yea not expecting plug and play at all. This is down the road post warranty and would expect transmission, harness, ECU, as well as some changes to handle the weight difference etc. etc. Again - if the truck stays with me 8-10 years without a better option available, a heart transplant would be in the cards.There was a place that swaps the Coyote into the 6G Bronco at SEMA, but it's hardly plug-n-play and more than likely how the RRaptor would end up if attempted. (ignore the Bronco specific stuff in that pic)
![]()
just going by the quoted numbers ( I havenāt had it on a dyno), it should by around 475HP / 550TQ.Exactly. What would you say you would be at after the AFE intake as of horsepower
Whatās the total you say you would have to spend to get it to that number?just going by the quoted numbers ( I havenāt had it on a dyno), it should by around 475HP / 550TQ.
Not bad for an utterly dependable daily driver.![]()