TBone4Eva
Member
- First Name
- Tyrone
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 15
- Location
- Maryland (DC Metro)
- Vehicle(s)
- 2024 Ranger Raptor
- Occupation
- IT
The corporation doesn't determine the winner. The jurors do and they don't work for the corporation. They don't even submit their votes to the corporation. The votes are sent to, and tallied by, a third party auditor. The auditor just tells the corporation who won in each category. If Ford bought the award, that would be difficult to prove (which by the way would be your burden to prove since you're making the allegation). Since the manufacturers plan to use the corporation's trademarks in their marketing to sell their vehicles, it is not improper for the corporation to sell a license for the use of those trademarks. After all, as you correctly stated, a non-profit does require money to function. That, again, does not automatically mean the award was bought. Finally just to be clear, I'm not saying the award is valid or not. I'm simply saying your allegation is not true simply because you believe it is.The logo is used "under license". Things that are used with no compensation are typically "used with permission". "Under license" implies the corporation was compensated. Non profit does NOT mean no one makes any money there.
You want to give validity to the "award", please do.
Sponsored